FANDOM

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • You can't just delete everything having to do with the SSF2 beta! Almost all of what you deleted was officially confirmed at one point or another.

      Loading editor
    • ne0 we already discussed this. the beta is part of the history of mcleodgaming. this is not just ssf2 wiki.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I've restored a few of the special attack articles that you deleted. The reason for my doing so is because those particular special moves had all been confirmed by previous Dojo articles.

      Loading editor
    • You also restored a good few of the dev articles. Nepotism for the win.

      Most of the old special moves were deleted because old dojos tended to be very unreliable. Quite a bit of the stuff from the old dojos have been de-confirmed since in numerous dev posts, and outdated information isn't particularly useful to readers.

      Also, please avoid typing in all caps. You can express much the same idea with considerably less accusatory language.

        Loading editor
    • Even with that being said, as long as that information was once officially confirmed, it's still relevant to Super Smash Flash 2.

      In addition. I restored the dev articles because they too are relevant to this wiki. Please remember that this is a wiki about McLeodGaming as a whole, not just SSF2.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I suggest editing this. The "whoops" part is not necessary.

      Loading editor
  • Who made the n00b badge? That is a really unprofessional name and needs to be changed (way the support a new editor by calling them a noob).

      Loading editor
  • Hey, when we agree to delete all the SSF2 Beta related articles? Even if it doesn't cover the current status of the game, it's not an excuse to delete it. I might agree to "mark for deletion" the misconceptions articles only but not the early stuff that got into old revisions of DOJO!! and Demos. You will have to help me with the restoration of all of 'em, or convice me...

      Loading editor
    • View all 24 replies
    • we are filling Byll's talk page

        Loading editor
    • ok

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • @McleodGamingWiki nice edit. Those articles should be deleted eventually as well.

      Loading editor
  • First of all, I got to say I'm glad that at least SOMEONE around here puts things as candidates of deletion instead of immediately deleting them with their adminship. Now, I agree we should delete that page, as it doesn't provide any useful information.

      Loading editor
  • Which template should I use for the info box?

      Loading editor
  • I did thank you very much. >:( All I did was not add an image. Seriously it's not that bad.

      Loading editor
    • There was also those old parameters that you forgot to remove. You may wish to examine the template page for documentation one what to delete and what to keep.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • That page might not be accurate, but that's why we have an edit button. It might be useful in the future.

      Loading editor
    • I suppose we could add content to that page, but is it really useful? I don't see why someone would want to read about which characters have brawlified sprites, and where their sprites came from. That kind of stuff could go in trivia sections, but a standalone article?

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.