FANDOM

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Also, could you please restore this?

    https://mcleodgaming.fandom.com/wiki/File:AMTFOS.JPG?action=history

    Even though it might be somewhat low quality, that image is one of the only traces of FoS we have, y'know.

      Loading editor
    • Nah, this image is low quality to the point of not actually depicting anything. I assume it was corrupted or something over the course of time... I don't know, but there's nothing to it anymore.

      I'll restore it temporarily just so you can look at it, though.

        Loading editor
    • ...oh. Rip.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello, I'm The Embraced One or TEO, and I'm the Fandom Wiki Manager for the McLeodGaming Wiki as well as an admin on Sekiro and the Hollow Knight Wikis in my free time. I'm here to act as a liaison between you and Fandom Staff and help you and your community. If you ever have any questions or issues related to the Wiki, its features (editing, templates, layouts, etc.), or anything else, feel free to reach out to me on and I will be happy to help out!

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I must say, I disagree with merging the planned move pages with their "replacement", especially if the replacement was replaced once again.

    I think we should either:

    1. Keep them. Maybe add more stuff related to the origin, or ask a dev about stuff we don't currently know.
    2. Make a planning page for every char with a planned move.
    3. Make one single planned page, along with a template for that, and drop all planned content there.
      Loading editor
    • Well I still see no reason to keep these pages. There's a pretty extensive surplus of moves like this with almost nothing to go off of but a picture (or even just a sprite) and a very brief description, and beyond that I feel like the fact they were never even programmed devalues them too much. I don't see how they're worth more than just "This character's special move was supposed to be this and it did this". There's something like that for pretty much every character in the game and I don't see us covering every single one of them with a page.

      For that reason, I do think it'd make the most sense to fit them into the trivia, like we did with Ōdama Rasengan on the Rasengan page, and we do something similar with every removed move's page as well.

      1. The origin shouldn't have to be the biggest source of info on the page, and expanding it would only exemplify how little there is to actually say about the move, not to mention the fact that there's often barely a move to connect it to. And even if we could pry info from devs, more detail doesn't change that we'd be making pages based on unrealized ideas for what's admittedly insignificant content.
      2. If anything that sounds even more unnecessary, especially with characters like Jigglypuff or Sonic where the only thing worth noting is a single special move or Final Smash.
      3. Pretty sure there's already a page for that. Not everything on the list needs to link to something, anyways.
        Loading editor
    • I mean, "removed content" isn't the same as "planned content", and wasn't there an issue about "page is too big" and stuff of the sorts? Splitting the page would help, y'know.

        Loading editor
    • You’re right, it’s not “removed content”. It is, however, “unused content”, which the page also covers. On that front, “planned content” could very easily be mistaken for “confirmed content”, so I think calling it unused would make more sense.

      I wasn’t the one who decided it was too big of a page so I’m not really sure what to say about that.

        Loading editor
    • Still though, I wouldn’t be opposed to you uploading the rest of the dojo images we’re missing, for the sake of archival.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I feel character pages like Kirby (Super Smash Flash 2) have names that are too long. We even made templates to shorten these names; they basically never get fully written due to their length, and this is affecting pages like Sora (Super Smash Flash 2)/Changelog (and Mr. Game & Watch (Super Smash Flash 2)/Standard attack, even though they will be gone sometime in the future. They aren't gone rn though so); those page names almost take up three lines in the title.

    Couldn't we shorten them up, making them like Kirby (SSF2) or something?

      Loading editor
    • Well I do agree with you that the name of the game does greatly extend the names of these pages. That said, I have to admit that I really don't see why the long names matter or why we should care about changing them, especially since, like you said, we've already invented templates to write them with anyways. Not that it isn't a change worth considering, but at least right now, I'm just not on board with it.

        Loading editor
    • It's due to formalities, abbreviations on titles didn't look right. Save for templates, I never recommended using abbreviations.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I'm not removing categories when I edit articles. It must be a bug or something.

      Loading editor
    • I see, what are you using to edit the pages then? Whatever the case, always make sure to show your changes before publishing so you can see anything you didn't want to change.

        Loading editor
    • I'm using the normal editing source. I'll keep that in mind from now on.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I noticed on your recent edit summary you claimed Waluigi might not be ready for 1.2 release. The page itself doesn't show who made that affirmation, though. There's nothing on the Forums or on MG's social networks, was it confirmed on Discord? I'm aware devs like TSON love to tease some important info on MG's Discord regarding the game's progress (as if they don't have a place to do it more formally) and you're a member there, which makes me wonder if we may need a page for Discord to cover such minimal yet important announcements that aren't share on the habitual sites. Whatcha say?

      Loading editor
    • View all 6 replies
    • So along with the McLeodGaming Discord server, would you say that the McLeodGaming official subreddit r/McLeodGaming warrants one as well?

      https://www.reddit.com/r/mcleodgaming/

        Loading editor
    • Are announcent properly done there? If so, I guess we can go ahead.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I just want to verify this, but was the Cucco item confirmed by an official source to be coming back in update 1.2?

      Loading editor
    • I'm actually not sure myself... if it was confirmed then I wasn't there when it happened. It looks like Gregory Naruto was the first person to note there was a new sprite for it in June 2015, and he uploaded the new sprite in June 2017, so I'd ask him if he remembers where he got that information.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • So, long story short, I was trying to edit the descriptions of Samus' page, updating the damage values and providing better descriptions, but somehow, when I published my changes, the entire table just...sort of broke. I fixes it already, but there are several rows in the moveset table where there are supposed to be mutiple rows in one cell, but I can't seem to figure how to separate them. I know this was probably a really shoddy explanation, but long story short, I just don't know how to fix something after I broke it.



    Thanks!

      Loading editor
    • It's fine, I fixed it up. For moves where multiple rows are used, each individual column has formatting (called rowspan) for how many rows they will take over. If one has a formatting of rowspan="2", for instance, the column will take up two rows. What you did was remove two rows without adjusting the rowspan, and that's when everything went downhill.

      As for the descriptions though, they aren't really meant to be super long. The extra detail is appreciated, I just think you went a little bit too far with it.

        Loading editor
    • Thank you!



      I just wanted to be a bit more descriptive with the attack descriptions, since I figured one of the main reason why people read through the moveset was for more information on them like kill percentages, uses, and versatility

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • "We don't keep around pages for removed background characters." And why not? Why possibly not? Assist Trophies, stages, special moves, items and Poké Ball Pokémon all keep their pages if they're removed, so why not background characters too?

      Loading editor
    • Well I didn't come up with the rule, so I can't completely say for sure and you'll have to wait for Byll to respond... but if I had to say, it's that background characters don't carry nearly the same weight as other elements that get removed. They're essentially stage-intrinsic elements that can't be interacted with and can't be described with more than a paragraph already, so the full extent of any removed background character's function can just be described in the trivia section of their respective stage page.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I have been playing this game for a long time since 2018, the game is an amazingly made and I shared the amazing experience to other people in my school. So when it comes to competitive mode, I do what all SSB newbies do: look at the tier list. Then I see some characters placed too high and some characters placed too low, which when other new players join will have a false view of the character's power in the game. 

    I honestly wish people could join together and make a new tier list since the tier list is nearly 2 years old 

    Thank you

    -SSF2 fan

      Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.