Thread:Byll/@comment-24442878-20160529005259/@comment-920954-20160529194054

Dark Ermac wrote: Agreed. We should continue waiting before editing any further articles on elements that have been changed, unless it doesn't hinder the 0.9b information. I'd suggest keeping the Beta tags on the articles that pertain to things that are not appearing in beta (but seriously who came up with that template name? It's bad and confusing and I don't like it). Well, of course that was me, hmmm... when you say "Beta tags" you mean Beta or Confirmed?