Category talk:Candidates for deletion

Please use this page to discuss pages that have been labeled for deletion.

Wolf O'Donnell
Why in the world is this article marked for deletion? It has relevance to the Super Smash Flash series for gods sake. Wolf makes a cameo in the opening riding his Wolfen. Sure it is not of significance but it deserves mention. The Smash Bros wiki itself mentions like all tiny character cameos in its wiki (even the smallest cameos it mentioned), so why not the Flash wiki? Wolf himself makes a cameo in the SSF2 opening. Sure, he is a gray version of Fox's sprite but it is obvious that the recolored version is in fact Wolf.

Celestial God (talk) 05:15, January 29, 2013 (UTC)


 * I reverted the tag. :/ Pentagon AVTFD  [E] 05:40, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Also which smash bros. Wiki are you referring to. The non-wikia one would not reference a non-canon appearance under wolf's page. Pentagon AVTFD  [E] 05:42, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation for X1
It's not needed. It probably won't be needed for years. Doqtor Kirby (Site) (talk) 22:33, January 27, 2016 (UTC)
 * Unneeded =/= needs to be deleted. There could be new people that might want to know about the tournaments, y'know.
 * I kinda agree with the Doq on this one, disambiguations should be for more than three pages or more; or when a page cannot have the neutral name over a similarly titled page because they are equally important, as in the case for Battlefield or Final Destination.
 * --Ak-Un Symbol.PNG BYLL  EL  WYLL  Ak-Un Symbol.PNG 04:06, January 29, 2016 (UTC)

Ice Climber

 * 1) Oppose: The delete reason on the summary is simply the person's (extremely subjective) opinion; and what does "No related to this page" even mean?

Planned move pages

 * 1) Oppose
 * 2) Support: There's a pretty extensive surplus of moves like this (at least one for almost every character) with almost nothing to go off of but a picture (or even just a sprite) and a very brief description, and beyond that I feel like the fact they were never even programmed devalues them too much. I don't see how they're worth more than just a mention in the unused content page. --CrazyNaut (talk) 23:13, June 16, 2019 (UTC)