Talk:Plasma Wire

Can I know what was wrong with my edit?Sachamel (talk) 22:23, October 14, 2014 (UTC)

Where do I start? Let's see maybe we already had a picture of Samus using her up special, but for some reason you thought that wasn't good enough. Another thing is like I said on the Plasma whip part, do not add another section unless its an advanced technique or a combo involved in the move. The gaining momentum from a jump also happens with DK's Spinning Kong and other special recoveries. You adding that section was very unnecessary. Niayre

23:17, October 14, 2014 (UTC)

You seem to be taking it a bit personal. Counterarguments.

1. The new image looked better, more zoomed in and without all that blank space.

2. It IS an advanced technique, confirmed by developers.

http://forums.mcleodgaming.com/viewtopic.php?p=1334534#p1334534

http://forums.mcleodgaming.com/viewtopic.php?p=1335821#p1335821

It doesn't have to be all flashy, complex or an engine exploit for it to be an AT.

3. Why does a combo qualify to have a new section? So if I "discover" that Paralyzer->Plasma Wire is a true combo I get to put it on the wiki? Brb working on it /s.

4. Even with all that, it was unnecessary to remove all the other information added, the better organization and better write up. Also I had better formatting (putting the "specials box" at the end for example)

I'm not trying to dismiss anyone's work here, so when I'm putting a new picture it isn't saying "hey the old one sucked I can do better!" but "I think it would look better this way and would improve the overall quality of the wiki". Same with writing sections again but with more info/better wording.

In the same vein, I don't want anyone to dismiss my work either; as you've seen I've worked a lot already with the palette swaps for each character, with no one having any problem with them or saying "But we already have pictures for them, aren't they good enough for you!?". I just do this because I love this game and having the stuff I put here get deleted for no reason and without even an explanation is silly and discouraging.

Hope you read this, waiting for your reply.

Sachamel (talk) 00:39, October 15, 2014 (UTC)